Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/59337
Title: Формування біорізноманіття риб
Other Titles: Formation of fish biodiversity
Authors: Труш, Андрій Васильович
metadata.dc.contributor.advisor: Гноєвий, І. В.
metadata.dc.contributor.affiliation: Державний біотехнологічний університет
Кафедра біотехнології, молекулярної біології та водних біоресурсів
Keywords: екологія;охорона природи;поширення виду;різноманітність риб;річка Харків;середовища проживання;трофічна ніша;ecology;nature conservation;species distribution;fish diversity;Kharkiv River;habitat;trophic niche
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Харків: ДБТУ
Citation: Труш А. В. Формування біорізноманіття риб: кваліфікаційна робота магістра: спец. 207 Воднi бiоресурси i аквакультура; наук. кер. І. В. Гноєвий. Харків: ДБТУ, 2024. 86 с.
Abstract: Мета кваліфікаційної роботи – оцінити поточний стан біорізноманіття риб, структуру рибного запасу, чисельність, поширення, трофічну екологію риб, загрози існування та рекомендувати заходи управління збереженням біорізноманіттям риб в річці Харків. Для вирішення мети були поставлені завдання: 1. вивчити екологію середовища існування риб у річці Харків; 2. вивчити видове різноманіття риб; 3. вивчити розподіл видів риби на п’яти ділянках, що характеризують різні середовища існування: від Муромського водосховища до впадіння в річку Лопань; 4. вивчити кореляцію між видовим багатством риби та гідрологічними характеристиками; 5. вивчити ймовірні загрози існування риб у річці Харків
Trush Andrii on the topic "Formation of fish biodiversity", carried out at the Department of Biotechnology, Molecular Biology and Aquatic Bioresources. Graduation qualification thesis is completed on 86 pages of computer text, includes 17 tables, 20 figures, 120 sources of used literature. The purpose of the qualification thesis is to assess the current state of fish biodiversity, the structure of fish stocks, the number, distribution, trophic ecology of fish, threats to existence and to recommend management measures for the preservation of fish biodiversity in the Kharkiv River. To solve the goal, the tasks were set: 1. to study the ecology of the habitat of fish in the Kharkiv River; 2. to study the types of fish diversity; 3. study the distribution of fish species in five areas characterizing different habitats: from the Murom Reservoir to the confluence with the Lopan River; 4. to study the correlation between species richness of fish and hydrological characteristics; 5. to study possible threats to the existence of fish in the Kharkiv River.
URI: https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua//handle/123456789/59337
metadata.dcterms.references: 1. Aadland L.P., 1993. Fish fauna of the River Betwa. North Am J Fish Manag.13:790–806. 2. Adholia U.N., 1977. Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. Geobios 4(6): 272–273. 3. Allen G.R., Erdmann, M.V., 2009. Genetic identification and color descriptions of early life-history stages of Belizean Phaeoptyx and Astrapogon (Teleostei: Apogonidae) with comments on identification of adult Phaeoptyx Check List, (3), 587–628. 4. Armantrout N.B., 1999. Methods for fish habitat inventory in streams/ Rivers. In: Proceedings of workshop germplasm inventory and gene banking of freshwater fishes. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda. 5. Arunachalam M, 2000. Aquatic habitat assessment. Hydrobiologia. 430:1–31. 6. Baldwin C.C., Mounts J.H., 2009. The center of the center of marine shore fish biodiversity: the Philippine Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences, 38, 113–140. 7. Baldwin C.C., Weigt, L.A., 2009. Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia.. Zootaxa, 2008, 1–22. 8. Bayley P., Li H., 1994. Ecohydrology and fisheries of the upper Brahmputra basin. Blackwell, Boston, pp 251–281. 9. Beaugrand, G., Reid, P.C., 2004. Disappearance of common skate Raia batis from Irish Sea. Nature, 426, 661–664. 10.Beaugrand G., Reid, P.C., 2004. Еffect on cod recruitment in the North Sea.Nature 426, 661–664. 11.Brander, K.M., 1981. Disappearance of common skate Raia batis from Irish Sea. Nature. 290, 48–49. 12.Boruah S., Biswas S.P., 2002. Riverine fisheries. The river handbook: hydrological and ecological principles. Environmentalist 22:119–131. 13.Bunn S.E., Arthington A.H., 2002. Model study of water use and water balance in Betwa Basin. Environ Manag. 30:492–507. 14.Carpenter K.E. & Springer V.G., 2005. Reconciling genetic lineages with species in western Atlantic Coryphopterus (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 72, 467–480. 15.Carvalho, G.R., Hauser, L., 1994. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 4, 326-350. 16.Chaube U.C., 1988. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. J Inst Eng Indian Civil Eng Div. 69:169–173. 17.Chu Y.-T., Li S., 1981. The evolutionary enigma of bonefishes (Albula spp.): cryptic species and ancient separations in a globally distributed shorefish. Oceanologica et Limnologica Sinica, 12, 103–116. 18.Carvalho G.R., Hauser L., 1994. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 4, 326–350. 19.Colborn J., Bowen B.W., 2001. Description of four new species, a new genus and a new family of elasmobranchiate fishes from deep sea of the South China Sea. Evolution, 55, 807–820. 20.Costanza R., Van Den Belt M., 1997. Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries. Nature. 387, 253–260. 21.Copp G.H., Wiesner C., 2005. Patterns of species richness and introduced species in native freshwater fish faunas of a Mediterranean-type basin: the Guadiana River. Appl Ichthyol. 21:242–262. 22.Corbacho C., Sanchez M.J., 2001. To be, or not to be, a non-native freshwater fish. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17(6):699–707. 23.Costanza, R., Van Den Belt, M., 1997. Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries. Nature, 387, 253-260. 24.Darwall W.R.T., Vie J.C., 2005. Environment and fish health: a holistic assessment of inland fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol. 12:287–293. 25.Dasmahapatra K.K., Mallet J., 2010. Systematics and biology of the deep-sea fish family Gibberichthyidae, a senior synonym of the family Kasidoroidae. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 264–273. 26.Das M.K., 2007. Identifying important sites for conservation of freshwater biodiversity: extending the speciesbased approach. Narendra Publishing House, pp 137–151. 27.Dawson TP, Berry PM, Kampa E (2003) The use of fish community structure as a measure of ecological degradation: a case study. J Nat Conserv. 11:25–30. 28.De Sylva D.P., Eschmeyer W.N., 1977. Mitrrondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real, and some that are not. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences. Fourth Series, 41, 215–231. 29.De Silva S.S., Abery N.W., Nguyen T.T.T., 2007. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Divers Distrib. 13:172–174. 30.Diaz, S., Tilman, D., 2006. Fishery stability, local extinctions and shifts in community structure in skates. PLoS Biol., 4, 1300-1305. 31.Dor M., 1984. Catalog of Fishes. Jerusalem (Israel Academy of Sciences and humanities), XXII. 437 pp., 2 maps. 32.Dulvy, N.K., Reynolds, J.D., 2000. Biodiversity loss threatens human well being. Conserv. Biol., 14, 283-293. 33.Dulvy, N.K., Reynolds, J.D., 2003. Trophic cascades in a formerly cod dominated ecosystem. Fish Fish., 4, 25-64. 34.Dudgeon D., Sullivan C.A., 2006. Endemic freshwater finfish of Asia: distribution and conservation status. Biol Rev. 81:163–182. 35.Eschmeyer W.N., 1998. Checklist of the Fishes of the Red Sea. California Academy of Sciences. 3 vols. 36.Flores S., Araya P.R., 2009. Fresh water fish biodiversity in the Yangtze River basin of China: patterns, threats and conservation Acta Limnol Bras 21(1):57–66. 37.Frank, K.T., Leggett, W.C., 2005. Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and management Science. 308, 1621–1623. 38.Fraser T.H., Allen G.R., 2010. Fishes of the Mascarene Islands (Réunion, Mauritius, Rodriguez). Zootaxa, 2348, 40–56. 39.Fricke R., 1999. Cardinalfish of the genus Apogonichthyoides Smith, 1949 (Apogonidae) with a description of a new species from the West-Pacific region. An Annotated Checklist, with Descriptions of new species. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, VIII, 759 pp. 40.Fricke R., 2008. Annotated checklist of fish and lamprey species (Gnathostomata and Petromyzontomorphi) of Turkey, including a Red List of threatened and declining species. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (A), N.S., 1: 1–76, 2 pls. 41.Fricke, R., Sari, H.M., 2007. Authorship, availability and validity of fish names described by Peter (Pehr) Simon Fosskål and Johann Christian Fabricius in the 'Descriptiones animalium' by Carsten Niebuhr in 1775 (Pisces). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (A), 706, 1–174 42.Fromentin, J.-M., Powers, J.E., 2005. Bayesian assessment of Northeast Atlantic spurdog using a stock production model, with prior for intrinsic population growth rate set by demographic methods. Fish Fish., 6, 281-306. 43.Fukushima M., Steel E.A., 2007. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation.Japan. Freshw Biol. 52:1511–1524. 44.Fu C., Lei G., 2003. Fish diversity and community structure in a tributary stream. Biodivers Conserv 12:1649–1685. 45.Gibbs J.P., 2000. Modelling the effects of dams on fresh water fish distribution. Conserv Biol. 14(1):314–317. 46.Growns I., Pollard D.A., 2003. Response of the fish community to human induced changes. Fish Manag Ecol. 10:209–220. 47.Habit E., Parra O., 2006. A comparison of fish assemblage associated with different riparian vegetation types. Freshw Biol. 51:1–11. 48.Hammond, T.R., Ellis, J.R., 2005. Atlantic bluefin tuna: population dynamics, ecology, fisheries and management. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci., 35, 299-303. 49.Hilborn, R., Rogers, D.E., 2003. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-36. 50.Hooper, D.U., Naeem, S., 2005. Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-36. 51.Hutchings, J.A., Puvanendran, V., 2007. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 274, 1693-1699. 52.Jackson, J.B.C., Steneck, R.S., Warner, R.W., 2001. Genetic variation in life history reaction norms in a marine fish. Science, 293, 629-638. 53.Jayaram K.C., 1999. Fish diversity in different habitats in the streams of lower Middle Western Himalayas. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, p 551. 54.Johal MS, Rawal Y.K., 2002. The freshwater fishes of the Indian Region. Polish J Ecol. 50:45–56. 55.Kang B., Wu Y., 2009. Assessing biological integrity in running waters. A method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Campaigne.. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 19:465–480. 56.Karr J.R., Schlosser I.J., 1986. Fish and fisheries in the Upper Mekong: current assessment of the fish community, threats and conservation. Special Publications, Illinois, 28 pp. 57.Ko¨ster, F.W., Schnack, D., Beyer, J.E., 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Current State and Trends (Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group). Sci. Mar., 67 (Suppl. 1), 37-49. 58.Laffaille P. , Legult A., 2005. Freshwater fish diversity of central India. Edited and published by National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources Fish Manag Ecol. 12:123–129. 59.Lakra W.S., Sarkar U.K., 2007., Temporal change in European eel, Anguilla anguilla, stock in a small catchment after installation of fish passes. Lucknow, pp 1–183. 60.Last, P.R., Stevens, J.D., 2009. Description of two new genera, Santelmoa and Bentartia and two new species of Zoarcidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) from the Southern Ocean. Fisheries Research & Development Corporation, 513 pp. 61.Leveque C., Martens K., 2005. Fish assemblage structure and aquatic pollution in a Brazilian stream: some limitations of diversity indices and models for environmental impact studies. Hydrobiologia. 542:32–67. 62.Lima-Junior S.E., Goitein R., 2006. An assessment of animal species diversity in continental waters. Ecol Freshw Fish. 15(3):284–290. 63.Lobb M.D., Orth D.J., 1991. Comparing fish assemblages and trophic ecology of permanent and intermittent researches in a Mediterranean stream. Trans Am Fish Soc. 120:65–78. 64.Mace, G., Brooks, T., 2005. Baltic cod recruitment – the impact of climate variability on key processes. Fish stock assessments in the Mediterranean – state of the art. Island, pp. 77-122. 65.MacKenzie, B.R., Kinze, C.C., 2002. Genetic differences among cod populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 59, 173-190. 66.Matallanas, J., 2009. Sharks and Rays of Australia. Polar Biology. 223-290. 67.Mas-Marti E., Monoz I., 2010. Habitat use by an assemblage of fish in a large warm water stream. Hydrobiologia. 25(5):711–722. 68.Mavruk, S., Avsar, D., 2008. The fishes of the Galápagos Archipelago: an update Review in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 18, 251–262. 69.McCosker, J.E., Rosenblatt, R.H., 2012. Non-native fishes in the Mediterranean from the Red Sea, by way of the Suez Canal. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (Series 4), 61. 70.Mishra D.N., Moza U., 1997. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on salmonid fish: lessons from white-spotted Charr Inland Fisheries Society of India, Barrackpore, pp 57–62. 71.Mora, C., Myers, R.A., 2008. Collection Building in Ichthyology and Herpetology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275,149–155. 72.Morita K., Yamamoto S., 2009. Changing senario of fish and fisheries.Changing perspectives of inland fisheries. Proceedings of the national seminar, march 16–17, 1997. Ecol Res 24(4):711–722. 73.Motita K., Yokota A., 2002. Streamflow drought severity analysis. Ecol Modell.155:85–94. 74.Nielsen E.E., Meldrup D., 2001. Ecological hypotheses for a historical reconstruction of upper trophic level biomass in the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Nature,413, 272. 75.Pandey R.P., Ramasastri K.S., 2008. Population viability of stream-resident salmoids after habitat fragmentation: a case study with whitespotted Charr (Salvelinus leucomaens).Water Res Manag. 22:1127–1141. 76.Payne A.I., Huq S., 2004. Patterns in the co-occurrence of stream fish metacommunties: the role of site suitability, morphology and phylogeny versus species interactions.; Mekong River Commission (MRC), Fisheries Programme (FP), pp 229–251. 77.Peres-Neto P.R., 2004. A review of the Ganges basin; its fish and fisheries. Proceedings of the second international symposium on the management of large rivers for fisheries, vol 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the PacificOecologia. 140:352–360. 78.Piet G.J., Rice J.C., 2004. Changes in the demersal fish assemblages of British coastal waters during the 20th century. ICES J. Mar. Sci.: J. du Conseil, 61, 1305-1312. 79.Pietsch, T.W. & Anderson, W.D., 1997. The completeness of taxonomic inventories for describing the global diversity and distribution of marine fishes. American Society of Ichthyology and Herpetology. Special Publication 3, 593 pp. 80.Prokofiev, A.M., Kukuev, E.I., 2007. Caratteri di alcuni nuovi generi e nuove specie di animali e piante della sicilia, convarie osservazioni sopra i medisimi. KMK Scientific Press, 162 pp. 81.Rafinesque, C.S., 1810. Systematics and distribution of the swallowerfishes of the genus Pseudoscopelus (Chisamodontidae). Messina, 20 pls. 82.Raghavan R., Pereira B., 2008. Managing aquatic species of conservation concern in the face of climate change and invasive species. Biodivers Conserv.17:3119–3131. 83.Raghavan R., Pereira B., 2008. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Biol Invasions. 10:37–40. 84.Rahel F.J., Bierwagen B., Taniguchi Y., 2008. Fish fauna of Chalakudy River, part of Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, Kerala, India: patterns of distribution, threats and conservation needs. Conserv Biol. 22(3):551–561. 85.Randall, J.E., 1994. Zoogeography of shore fishes of the Indo-Pacific region. Fauna of Saudia Arabia, 14, 259–275. 86.Randall J.E., 1998. Twenty-two new records of fishes from the Red Sea. Zoological Studies, 37, 227–268. 87.Randall J.E., 2007. Shore Fishes of Easter Island. University of Hawai’i Sea Grant College Program, Honolulu, 546 pp. 88.Randall J.E., Cea A. Reef and Shore Fishes of the Hawaiian Islands. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu. XII. 1-154. 89.Ricciardi A., Rasmussen J.B., 1999. Exotic fish species in a global biodiversity hotspot: observations from River Chalakudy, part of Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Conserv Biol. 13:1220–1222. 90.Robertson D.R., Smith-Vaniz, W.F., 2008. Use of clove oil in collecting coral reef fishes for research. BioScience, 58, 165–170. 91.Robertson D.R. & Smith-Vaniz W.F., 2010. Rotenone: An essential but demonized tool for assessing. BioScience, 66, 192–2020. 92.Robins C.R., de Sylva D.P., 1965. Paraulopidae and Paraulopus, a new family and genus of aulopiform fishes with revised relationships within the order. Bulletin of Marine Science, 15, 189–201. 93.Rogers S.I., Ellis J.R., 2000. Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks. J. Mar. Sci.: J. du Conseil, 57, 866-881. 94.Rowe, S., Hutchings, J.A., 2006. Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 135, 529-538. 95.Sarkar U.K., Bain M.B., 2007. Cumulative effects of pulp mill and municipal effluents on the epilithic biomass and nutrient limitation in a large northern river ecosystem. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw. 17:349–359. 96.Sato T., Nakabo T., 2002. The Kasidoroidae, a new family of mirapinniform fishes from the western Atlantic Ocean. Ichthyological Research, 49, 25–46. 97.Scrimgeour G., Chambers P., 2000. Priority habitats for the conservation of large River fishes in the Ganges River basin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 57:1342–1354. 98.Sinclair, M., Valdimarsson, G., 2003. Sound production by Atlantic cod during spawning. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. 20:249–270. 99.Shaffer A.J., Crain P., 2009. Fish diversity with relation to water quality. Hydrobiologia. 636:179–190. 100. Schwarzhans W., & Nielsen, J.G., 2005. Relevance of cryptic fishes in biodiversity assessments: a case study at Buck Island Reef National Monument, St. Croix. The Beagle, Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory, 21, 73–163. 101. Shahnawaz A., Santosh K., 2010. Fish habitat use response to anthropogenic induced changes of physical processes in the Elwha estuary. Environ Monit Assess.161:83–91. 102. Shannon C.E., Wiener W., 1963. Macroinvertebrate assessments of 22 locations in SRS streams, in support of the Integrator Operable Unit Program University Illinois Press, Urbana. Pp 36. 103. Smith-Vaniz W.F., Rocha, L.A., 2006. Review of the Dinematichthyini (Teleostei: Bythitidae) of the Indo-West Pacific. Part I. Diancistrus and two new genera with 26 new species. Bulletin of Marine Science, 79, 17–48. 104. Song J.-K., Parenti L.R., 1995. Pacific plate biogeography, with special reference to shorefishes. Copeia 1995, 114–118. 105. Specht W.L., Paller M.H., 2004. The mathematical theory of communication., July–August 2003. 106. Springer V.G., 1982. Clearing and staining whole fish specimens for simultaneous demonstration of bone, cartilage, and nerves. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 367, 1–184. 107. Sreekantha K.V., Ramachandra T.V., 2005. Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries, 2 volumes. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Ecol Environ Conserv.11:337–348. 108. Talwar P.K., Jhingran A., 1991. Fish diversity in Linganamakki Reservoir. 1158 pp. 109. Taylor L.R., Struhsaker, P.J., 1983. An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (Series 4), 43, 87–110. 110. Taylor W.R., 1967. Megamouth a new species, genus, and family of lamnoid shark (Megachasma pelagios, family Megachasmidae) from the Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 122, 1–17. 111. Thacker C.E., 2009. A method for preserving color in biological specimens. Copeia 2009, 93–104. 112. Waller R.A., Eschmeyer W.N., 1965. Phylogeny of Gobioidei and placement within Acanthomorpha, with a new classification and investigation of diversification and character evolution. BioScience, 15, 361. 113. Welcomme R.L., 1985. Fish community structure as a measure of degradation and rehabilitation of riperine systems in an agricultural drainage basin. FAO Fish Tech Pap. 262:1–318. 114. Wichert G.A., Rapport D.J., 1998. River fisheries. Environ Manag. 22(3): 425–443. 115. Whitehead P.J.P., Tortonese, E., 1984–1986 Revision of the congrogadid Haliophis (Pisces: Perciformes), with the description of a new species from Indonesia, and comments on the endemic fish fauna of the northern Red Sea. 1 (1984), 510 pp.; 2 (1986), 511–1007; 3 (1986), 1008–1473. 116. Winterbottom R., 1985. Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris, (UNESCO); Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 209–217. 117. Wolter C., Grosch U., 2000. Genetic differentiation of white spotted Charr (Salvelinus leucomaens) population after habitat fragmentation: spatialtemporal changes in gene frequencies. Fish Manag Ecol. 7:97–104. 118. Yachi, S., Loreau, M., 1999. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 1463-1468. 119. Yamamoto S., Maekawa K., 2004. Long-term effects of human influence on fish community structure and fisheries in Berlin water: an urban water system. Conserv Genet. 5:529–538. 120. Zemlak T.S., Hebert, P.D.N., 2009. DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9 (suppl. 1), 237–242
Appears in Collections:207 - "Водні біоресурси та аквакультура" (Магістри)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2024_M_207_VB_13m_Trush.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.