Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал:
https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua/handle/123456789/59310| Назва: | Оцінка кормової бази судака (Sander lucioperca) в природному середовищі |
| Інші назви: | Evaluation of the feed base of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in the natural environment |
| Автори: | Боровинський, Олег Володимирович |
| Науковий керівник : | Гноєвий, І. В. |
| Місце роботи: | Державний біотехнологічний університет Кафедра біотехнології, молекулярної біології та водних біоресурсів |
| Ключові слова: | судак;природні та штучні корми;харчова адаптація малька;індекс відносної харчової важливості гідробіонтів;водосховища;zander;natural and artificial feeds;food adaptation of fry;index of relative nutritional importance of hydrobionts;reservoirs |
| Дата публікації: | 2024 |
| Видавництво: | Харків: ДБТУ |
| Бібліографічний опис: | Боровинський О. В. Оцінка кормової бази судака (Sander lucioperca) в природному середовищі: кваліфікаційна робота магістра: спец. 207 Воднi бiоресурси i аквакультура; наук. кер. І. В. Гноєвий. Харків: ДБТУ, 2024. 67 с. |
| Короткий огляд (реферат): | Мета кваліфікаційної роботи – надати короткий огляд харчування судака в умовах
Трав'янського і Берекського водосховищ Харківського області, включаючи його природні
звички харчування (категорії здобичі в залежності від розмірних класів судака), запропонувати
методи адаптації малька судака до переходу від живої природної їжі до штучної дієти, тим
самим зробити внесок у знання біології цього хижака.
Для вирішення мети були поставлені завдання:
1. Дослідити розмір і надати перелік видів гідробіонтів, знайдених у шлунках різних
розмірних класів судака:
2. Оцінити кормову базу судака у водосховищах Харківської області;
3. Визначити риб-жертв судака у залежності від їх індексу відносної харчової важливості;
4. Визначити трофічні рівні судака у водоймах в залежності від його розмірних класів;
5. Визначити сезонні зміни раціону судака;
6. Визначити оптимальні терміни переведення малька судака на штучні корми в умовах
установок с замкненим циклом водопостачання The purpose of the qualification thesis is to provide a brief overview of pike perch nutrition in the conditions of the Travyansky and Berek reservoirs of the Kharkiv region, including its natural feeding habits (prey categories depending on the size classes of pike perch), to propose methods of adaptation of pike perch fry to the transition from live natural food to an artificial diet , thereby contributing to the knowledge of the biology of this predator. To solve the goal, the tasks were set: 1. Investigate the size and provide a list of the types of hydrobionts found in the stomachs of different size classes of zander: 2. To evaluate the feed base of zander in reservoirs of the Kharkiv region; 3. Determine pike prey fish depending on their index of relative nutritional importance; 4. To determine the trophic levels of zander in reservoirs depending on its size classes; 5. Determine seasonal changes in the pike perch diet; 6. To determine the optimal terms for transferring pikeperch fry to artificial feeds in the conditions of installations with a closed water supply cycle |
| URI (Уніфікований ідентифікатор ресурсу): | https://repo.btu.kharkov.ua//handle/123456789/59310 |
| Використані джерела: | 1. Amundsen PA, Gabler HM, Staldvik FJ. 1996. A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data-modification of the Costello (1990) method. Journal of Fish Biology 48:607–614. 2. Apaydın Yağcı, M., H. Çubuk. 2006. Çubuk Beyşehir Gölü’ndeki Sudak Populasyonu (Sander lucioperca) nun Beslenme Özellikleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beyşehir Meslek Yüksekokulu Uluslararası Beyşehir ve Yöresi Sempozyumu Beyşehir/ Konya, 420-427. 3. Balik Ü. 1999. The feeding features of the pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca) population in Lake Beysehir. Turkish Journal of Zoology 23:189–194. 4. Balık, S. and R. Geldiay. 2002. Türkiye Tatlısu Balıkları Kitabı, Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları IV. Baskı, 46. 5. Balık, İ., R. Uysal. 2004. Food and feeding habits of the pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) population from Lake Eğirdir (Turkey)Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 28, 715-722. 6. Balık, İ., A. Alp. 2006. Size com- position, growth characteristics and stock analysis of the pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, population in Lake Eğirdir. Turkish Journal of Zoology 30, 19-26. 7. Barros JS, Cunha MJ, Lino M, Vieira N, Valente ACN. 2000. Evaluation of the water quality and biotic communities of two Portuguese reservoirs (Alto Lindoso and Ermal) and their relationship with recreational fishing. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 27: 2693–2698. 8. Becer, Z.A., R. İkiz. 1997. Eğirdir Gölü’ndeki Sudak (Stizoste- dion lucioperca L., 1758) Populasyonunun Mide İçerikleri. XIII.Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi 5, 190-200. 9. Bernet, D.; Schmidt, H.; Wahli, T., 1999. Histopathology in fish: Proposal for a protocol to assess aquatic pollution. J. Fish Dis., 22, 25–34. 10. Bertin, G.; Averbeck, D. 2006. Cadmium: Cellular effects, modifications of biomolecules, modulation of DNA repair and genotoxic consequences (a review). Biochimie, 88, 549–559. 11. Bousseba, M.; FHasnaoui, M. 2020. Food preferences of Pike Perch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) in Morocco. E3S Web Conf. EDP Sci., 150, 02011. 12. Britton JR, Shepherd JS. 2005. Biometric data to facilitate the diet reconstruction of piscivorous fauna. Folia Zoologica 54:193–200. 13. Buijse, A.D. and R.P. Houthuijzen. 1992. Piscivory, growth and size selective mortality of age 0 pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sci- ences 49, 894-902. 14. Bulletin Française de la Pêche et la Pisciculture 263:77–79. 15. Campbell RNB. 1992. Food of an introduced population of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca L., in lake Egirdir, Turkey. Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 23:71–85. 16. Cerveny, D.; Rosmus, J.; Randak, T. 2014. Contamination of fish in important fishing grounds of the Czech Republic. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 109, 101–109. 17. Clavero M, García-Berthou E. 2006. Homogenization dynamics and introduction routes of invasive freshwater fish in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecological Modelling 16:2313–2324. 18. Cortes, E., 1997. A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elesmobranch fishes. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 54, 726- 738. 19. Cortés E., 1999. Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 56:707–717. 20. Çubuk, H., Ceylan, 2006. Beyşehir ve Eğirdir Göllerindeki Ekonomik Balık Stoklarının Tespiti ve Sürdürülebilirliklerinin Araştırılması. Project number: Tagem Haysüd/2005/09/02/02. 21. Darnerud, P.O., Petersson Grawé, K., 2006. Dietary intake estimations of organohalogen contaminants based on Swedish market basket data. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1597–1606. 22. Davidson, P.W.; Myers, G.J.; Weiss, B. 2004. Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics, 113, 123–129. 23. Demirsoy, A., 1997. YaşamınTemel Kuralları. Entomoloji. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Biyoloji Bölümü Ankara, 2 (2). 24. Demirsoy A., 1998. YaşamınTemel Kuralları. Invertebrata (Böcekler Dışında). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Biyoloji Bölümü Ankara, 2 (1). 25. Dörner H, Hülsmann S, Hölker F, Skov C, Wagner A., 2007. Size dependent predator-prey relationships between pikeperch and their prey fish. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16:307–314. 26. Ekmekçi, F.G., F. Erk’akan, 1997. Cannibalism as a regulatory force of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), population dynamics in the Lowland Sulejow Reservoir (Central Poland). Turkish Journal of Zoology 21, 421-430. 27. Esmaeilbeigi, M.; Moghaddam, J.A. 2021. Intra and extracellular effects of benzo [α] pyrene on liver, gill and blood of Caspian White fish (Rutilus frissi kutum): Cyto-genotoxicity and histopathology approach. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 163, 942. 28. European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Setting Maximum Levels for Certain Contaminants in Foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union No. 1881/2006 364:5-24. 29. European Commission (EC) SANTE 11312/2021-Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed. 2021. 30. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Beryllium, Cadmium, Mercury and Exposures in the Glass Manufacturing Industry; IARC Scientific Publications WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 1993; Volume 58, pp. 119–237. 31. Ivanovic, J.; Baltic, 2016. Metal concentrations in water, sediment and three fish species from the Danube River, Serbia: A cause for environmental concern. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 105–112. 32. Jakubavic, E.; Tyrell Deweber, J.; Hommik, K.. 2022. Status and future perspectives for pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) stocks in Europe. bioRxiv.: 12.20. 162. 33. Frankiewicz, P., M. Zalewski. 1999. Eğirdir Gölü’ndeki sudak Stizostedion lucioperca (Linneaus, 1758) populasyonunda oluşan değişimlerin değerlendirilmesi. Hydrobiologia 408/409, 47-55. 34. Frisk, M.; Steffensen, J.F., 2012. Thermal optimum for pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) and the use of ventilation frequency as a predictor of metabolic rate. Aquaculture 324, 151–157. 35. Froese R, Pauly D, editors. 2010. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available: www.fishbase.org, version Accessed November 2010. 36. Gante HF, Moreira L, Micael J, Alves MJ. 2008. First record of Barbonymus schwanenfeldii (Bleeker) in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Fish Biology 72:1089–1094. 37. Gómez-Caruana F, Díaz-Luna JL. 1991. Guía de los peces continentales de la Península Ibérica. Madrid: Penthalon. pp. 399. 38. Hamilton, P.B.; Tyler, C.R., 2017. Adaptive capabilities and fitness consequences associated with pollution exposure in fish. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 372, 42. 39. Hammer O, Harper D, Ryan P. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4:1–9. 40. Hyslop EJ. 1980. Stomach contents analysis - a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17:411–429. 41. Kangur A. 2000. Feeding of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), in Lake Peipsi. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology, Ecology 49:98–108. 42. Kangur, P., Kangur, A., 2007. Dietary importance of various prey fishes for pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in large shallow lake Võrtsjärv (Estonia) Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol., 56 (2), 154-167. 43. Kangur A, Kangur P. 1998. Diet composition and size-related changes in the feeding of pikeperch, Stizostedion lucioperca (Percidae) and pike, Esox lucius (Esocidae) in the Lake Peipsi (Estonia). Italian Journal of Zoology. 65: 255–259. 44. Karadžic´, V.; Natic´, D. 2010. Phytoplankton and eutrophication development in the water supply reservoirs Garaši and Bukulja (Serbia). Desalination, 255, 91–96. 45. Karas P, Sandström A. 2002. Effects of eutrophication on Y-O-Y freshwater fish communities in coastal areas of the Baltic. Environmental Biology of Fishes 63:89–101. 46. Keskinen, T., 2008. Feeding ecology and behaviour of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) in boreal lakes. Jyväskylä Studies in Biological and Environmental Science 190. 47. Khemis, I.B.; Sadok, S. 2017. Heavy metals and minerals contents in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), carp (Cyprinus carpio) and flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) from Sidi Salem Reservoir (Tunisia): Health risk assessment related to fish consumption. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24, 494–507. 48. Kopp D, Cucherousset J, Syväranta J, Martino A, Céréghino R, Santoul F. 2009. Trophic ecology of the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in its introduced areas: a stable isotope approach in southwestern France. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332:741–746. 49. Kostic-Vukovic, J.; Vukovic-Gacˇic, B. 2021. Temporal variation of biomarkers in common bream Abramis brama (L., 1758) exposed to untreated municipal wastewater in the Danube River in Belgrade, Serbia. Environ. Monit. Assess., 193, 465. 50. Kostic, J.; Lenhardt, M., 2017. The impact of multiple stressors on the biomarkers response in gills and liver of freshwater breams during different seasons. Sci. Total Environ., 601, 670–681. 51. Kottelat, M.; Freyhof, J. 2007. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes; Publications Kottelat: Berlin, Germany, pp. 534–535. 52. Küçük, F., İ. Gülle, 2009. Review of the ichthyofaunal changes in lake Eğirdir between 1915 and 2007. Turkish Journal of Zoology 33, 277-286. 53. Lappalainen, J., 2001. Effects of environmental factors, especial- ly temperature, on the population dynamic of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) Department of Limnolog and Environmental Protection, FIN-0014, University of Hel sinki, Finland. 54. Lappalainen J, Olin M, Vinni M. 2006. Pikeperch cannibalism: effects of abundance, size and condition. Annales Zoologici Fennici 43:35–44. 55. Lehtonen, H., Hansson, S. and H. Winkler, 1996. Biology and exploitation of pike-perch, Stizostedion lucioperca (L.), in the Baltic Sea area. Ann. Zool. Fennici 33, 525-535. 56. Leunda PM, Oscoz J, Elvira B, Agorreta A, Perea S, Miranda R. 2008. Feeding habits of the exotic black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) in the Iberian Peninsula: first evidence of direct predation on native fish species. Journal of Fish Biology 73:96–114. 57. Lever C. 1996. Naturalized fishes of the world. London: Academic Press. pp. 448. 58. Markovic, ZSpasic, M. 2011. Aquaculture and fishery in Serbia-status and potentials. In Proceedings of the V International Conference “Aquaculture & Fishery” Faculty of Agriculture, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia, 1–3 June 2011; pp. 36–40. 59. Mazej, Z.; Pokorny, B. 2010. Heavy metal concentrations in food chain of Lake Velenjsko jezero, Slovenia: An artificial lake from mining. Arch. Environ., 58, 998–1007. 60. Milardi, M.; Lappalainen, J., 2011. Problems in managing a slow-growing pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) population in Southern Finland. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 400, 8. 61. Miloškovic, A, Manojlovic, D. 2013. The accumulation and distribution of metals in water, sediment, aquatic macrophytes and fishes of the Gruža Reservoir, Serbia. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 90, 563–569. 62. Miloškovic´, A.; Miloševic´, D., 2016. Spatial monitoring of heavy metals in the inland waters of Serbia: A multispecies approach based on commercial fish. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 918–933. 63. Miranda R, Escala MC. 2002. Guía de identificación de restos óseos de los Ciprínidos presentes en España. Escamas, opér- culos, cleitros y arcos faríngeos. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, Serie Zoológica 28. 64. Mustamäki, N.; Bergström, U.; Ådjers, K.; Sevastik, A.; Mattila, J. 2014. Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) in decline: High mortality of three populations in the northern Baltic Sea. Ambio, 43, 325–336. 65. Nikolic, D.; Raškovic, B.3 2021. Sex-specific elemental accumulation and histopathology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) from Garaši reservoir (Serbia) with human health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 700–711. 66. Nikolic, D. 2022. Accumulation of 25 elements in gills, liver, gonads, and muscle of European chub (Squalius cephalus), Cactus roach (Rutilus virgo), and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) from Zlatar reservoir (Serbia). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 271–280. 67. Nikolic, D.; Raškovic, B., 2022. Toxic elements in water and sediment from six reservoirs in Serbia. Environ. Pollut, 310, 119871. 68. Nikolic, D.; Ðikanovic, V.; Hegediš, A., 2020, The European Chub (Squalius cephalus) as an Indicator of Reservoirs Pollution and Human Health Risk Assessment Associated with Its Consumption. Water Res. Manag., 10, 13–18. 69. Nilsson PA, Brömark C. 2000. Prey vulnerability to a gape-sized limited predator: behavioural and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. Oikos 88:539–546. 70. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia Nos. 32/2002, 25/2010 & 28/2011 2011. Regulation on the Quantities of Pesticides, Metals and Metalloids and Other Toxic Substances, Chemotherapeutics, Anabolics and Other Substances That Can Be Found in Food. 71. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 56/2015 & 94/2018 (2018a). Naredba o Merama za Ocˇuvanje i Zaštitu Ribljeg Fonda. 72. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 22/2018 & 90/2018 (2018b). Regulation on the Maximum Permitted Residue Levels of Pesticides in Food and Animal Feed and Feed and Animal Feed for Which Maximum Quantities of Residues of Pesticides Are Permitted. Annex 5-Regulation on Maximum Allowed Amounts of Certain Contaminants in Food and Feed for Animals of Plant and Animal Origin. 73. Oscoz J., Miranda R. 2005. Spring diet composition of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) in the Urederra River (Spain). International Journal of Limnology 41: 27–34. 74. Pauly D, Trites AW, Capuli EV, Christensen V. 1998. Diet com- position and trophic levels of marine mammals. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 55:467–481. 75. Peltonen H, Rita H, Ruuhijärvi J., 1996. Diet and prey selection of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) in Lake Vesijärvi analyzed with a logit model. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33:481–487. 76. Peltonen, H., J. Ruuhijärvi (1996). Diet and prey selection of pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.) in Lake Vesijärvi analysed with a logit model. Ann. Zool. Fennici 33, 481-487. 77. Pearre, S.J.R. (1982). Estimating Prey Preference by Predators: Uses of Various Indices and a Proposal of Another Based on X2. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 39, 914-923. 78. Pérez-Bote JL, Roso R. 2009b. Depredación de Natrix maura por Sander lucioperca en el SO de la Península Ibérica. Boletín de la Asociación Herpetológica Española 20:117–119. 79. Persic A, Roche H, Ramade F. 2004. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope quantitative structural assessment of dominant species from the Vaccarès Lagoon trophic web (Camargue Biosphere Reserve, France). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 60:261–272. 80. Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M.S. and I.L.K. Iverson, 1971. Food Habits of Albocore, Bluefin Tuna and Bonito in California Wa- ters. Fish Bull., 152, 1-105. 81. Policar, T.; Teerlinck, S.; Damien Toner, D., 2019. Recent progress in European percid fish culture production technology – Tackling bottlenecks. Aquac. Int., 27, 151–174. 82. Popova, O.A., Sytina L.A., 1976. Food and feeding relations of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Pikeperch (Sti- zostedion lucioperca) in various waters of the USSR. J. Fish Res. Board Can., 34, 1559-1570. 83. Prenda J, Arenas MP, Freitas D, Santos Reis M, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2002. Bone length of Iberian freshwater fish, as a pre- dictor of length and biomass of prey consumed by piscivores. Limnetica 21:15–24. 84. Ribeiro F, Orjuela RL, Magalhães MF, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2007. Variability in feeding ecology of a South American cichlid: a reason for successful invasion in mediterranean-type rivers? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16:559–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1600- 0633.2007.00252. 85. Ricker, W.E. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations; Reprint; Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Bulletin Fisheries Research Board Canada, University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1975; Volume 191, pp. 1–382. 86. Santos, R.M.B.; Cortes, R.M.V., 2022. Seasonal differences in water pollution and liver histopathology of Iberian barbel (Luciobarbus bocagei) and Douro nase (Pseudochondrostoma duriense) in an agricultural watershed. Water, 14, 444. 87. Schoener, T.W., 1970. First year ontogenetic diet patterns in two coexisting Sander species, S. lucioperca and S. volgensis in Lake Balaton. Ecology 51, 1228-1250. 88. Smederevac-Lalic, M. Socio-Ekonomske i Biološke Karakteristike Privrednog Ribolova na Dunavu [Doktorska Disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, 2013]. NaRDuS –National Repository of Dissertations in Serbia. 89. Specziár, A., 2005. Non-synchronous spatial overlap of liz- ards in patchy habitats. Hydrobiologia 549, 115-130. 90. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. Fish Catch in Rivers, Ponds and Channels. Fish Catch, 2000–2022. 2022. 91. Stejskal, I.; Gasco, L., 2023. Defatted black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) diets: Effects on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fillet quality, economic and environmental sustainability. Anim. Nutr., 12, 7–19. 92. Steenfeldt, S. Falahatkar, B.; Mhetli, M., 2015. Current status of Eurasian percid fishes aquaculture. In Biology and Culture of Percid Fishes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 817–841. 93. Tchounwou, P.B.; Ninashvili, N., 2003. Environmental exposure to mercury and its toxicopathologic implications for public health. Environ. Toxicol., 18, 149–175. 94. Usero, J.; Gonzalez-Regalado, E.; Gracia, I. 1997. Trace metals in the bivalve molluscs Ruditapes decussatus and Ruditapes philippinarum from the Atlantic Coast of Southern Spain. Environ. Int., 23, 291–298. 95. Vander J, Cabana G, Rasmussen JB, 1999. Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:1142–1158. 96. Waalkes, M.P. 2003. Cadmium carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res., 533, 107–120. 97. Walker, C.H.; Peakall, D.B. 2012. Principles of Ecotoxicology, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2012; pp. 1–352. 98. Willemsen, J., 1977. Food Analysis and Rate of Digestion. In: Methods for Assessment of Fish Production in Freshwater. J. Fish Res. Board Can., 34, 1710-1719. 99. Windell, J.T., 1971. Population dynamics of percids in lake Ijssel and some smaller lakes in the Netherlands. W.E. Ricker (Ed.) Blackwell, Oxford, 215-226. 100.Yarar, M. and G. Magnin. 1997. The feeding behavior of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca living in Hirfanli dam lake. Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği. 101.Yilmaz M, AblakÖ. 2003. Türkiye’nin Önemli Kuş Alanları. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 27:1159–1165. 102.Zhu, Q.L.; Li, W.Y., 2018. Life-cycle exposure to cadmium induced compensatory responses towards oxidative stress in the liver of female zebrafish. Chemosphere, 210, 949–957. |
| Розташовується у зібраннях: | 207 - "Водні біоресурси та аквакультура" (Магістри) |
Файли цього матеріалу:
| Файл | Опис | Розмір | Формат | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024_M_207_VB_13m_Borovyns_kyy_O_V.pdf Restricted Access | 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | Переглянути/Відкрити Запит копії |
Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.